Overall impact of the 40 most produced foods on the environment: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Getting to know the actual impact of food on the environment is tricky business. Indeed, depending on the source<ref>Depending on the various ties that the researchers or institute funding their research may have with the industry which can have a tremendous impact on the numbers so to say.</ref>, the farming system at play in the research<ref>The research may, more than often, exclusively focus on the american farming industry and its leaders, not taking into account small scale, alternative farming, or legislation at play in Europe or other parts of the world.</ref> or the parameters investigated in the study, the overall results may vary tremendously. Furthermore, the “impact on the environment” is more than often restricted to CO2 emissions. Water scarcity, the degradation of the soils<ref>Food production creates ~32% of global terrestrial acidification and ~78% of eutrophication.</ref> or the destruction of ecosystems<ref>e.g deforestation, destruction of “submarine forests” such as coral reefs and algae, annihilation of insect and animal species</ref> are to be considered also in relation  to the CO2 emissions, as well as the impact of the food chain (farm, packaging, transport, retail) on the overall environmental print of the production of food stuffs. All of these elements do, indeed, contribute to the health of the planet and one cannot be favored in relation to another (a low level of CO2 in the atmosphere would be of little help if the majority of our soils would be to acidic to be used for cultivation).     
Getting to know the actual impact of food on the environment is tricky business. Indeed, depending on the source<ref>Depending on the various ties that the researchers or institute funding their research may have with the industry which can have a tremendous impact on the numbers so to say.</ref>, the farming system at play in the research<ref>The research may, more than often, exclusively focus on the american farming industry and its leaders, not taking into account small scale, alternative farming, or legislation at play in Europe or other parts of the world.</ref> or the parameters investigated in the study, the overall results may vary tremendously. Furthermore, the “impact on the environment” is more than often restricted to CO2 emissions. Water scarcity, the degradation of the soils<ref>Food production creates ~32% of global terrestrial acidification and ~78% of eutrophication.</ref> or the destruction of ecosystems<ref>e.g deforestation, destruction of “submarine forests” such as coral reefs and algae, annihilation of insect and animal species</ref> are to be considered also in relation  to the CO2 emissions, as well as the impact of the food chain (farm, packaging, transport, retail) on the overall environmental print of the production of food stuffs. All of these elements do, indeed, contribute to the health of the planet and one cannot be favored in relation to another (a low level of CO2 in the atmosphere would be of little help if the majority of our soils would be to acidic to be used for cultivation).     


== Why go through the numbers? ==
<u>Why go through the numbers?</u>


Researching the matter may be a tremendous, easily biased and forever evoluting task, the spreadsheet below is thus here published to allow us, as consumers and climate conscious citizens, to take a first step towards the understanding of the complex “environmental impact” of various foods. This step may therefore allow us to consider the plurality of impacts of the food we buy and therefore  drive us to dig a little deeper when grocery shopping or considering our diet.
Researching the matter may be a tremendous, easily biased and forever evoluting task, the spreadsheet below is thus here published to allow us, as consumers and climate conscious citizens, to take a first step towards the understanding of the complex “environmental impact” of various foods. This step may therefore allow us to realize that there is no systematic relationship<ref>As we will therefore witness, a small CO2 print does not necessarily mean “good for the environment” as the heavy use of water and the deep acidification of the soil may for instance be off the charts for a low CO2 print product. </ref> between CO2 emission and good or bad farming practices hopefully driving us to dig a little deeper when considering our diet and shopping habits.


We will here be able to compare the overall CO2 emissions, the land use, the acidification, the eutrophisation as well as the water scarcity impacted by the 40 most produced foods in the world. As we will therefore witness, a small CO2 print does not necessarily mean “good for the environment” as the heavy use of water and the deep acidification of the soil may for instance be off the charts for a low CO2 print product.  
We will here be able to compare the overall CO2 emissions, the land use, the acidification, the eutrophisation as well as the water scarcity impacted by the 40 most produced foods in the world. These numbers, gathered from the largest database to date: 40,000 farms, across 119 countries include high impact industrials as well as small scale, organic or bio dynamic farms.


== References & details ==
== References & details ==