4,149
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
https://www.i4ce.org/wp-core/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/i4ce-PrixCarbon-VA.pdf</ref> It is still considered today that one of the main efforts to mitigate climate change would come from finance mechanisms. “Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development”<ref>Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Article 02, (c), UNFCC, 2015. | https://www.i4ce.org/wp-core/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/i4ce-PrixCarbon-VA.pdf</ref> It is still considered today that one of the main efforts to mitigate climate change would come from finance mechanisms. “Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development”<ref>Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Article 02, (c), UNFCC, 2015. | ||
source: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf</ref> was one of the objectives of the 2015 Paris Agreement, following Kyoto Protocol. | source: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf</ref> was one of the objectives of the 2015 Paris Agreement, following Kyoto Protocol. | ||
==What are the flaws of carbon pricing?== | ==What are the flaws of carbon pricing?== | ||
<strong>“<i>There are better ways of tackling climate change than by privatising the Earth's carbon-cycling capacity.</i>” (Larry Lohmann, 2006)</strong> | <strong>“<i>There are better ways of tackling climate change than by privatising the Earth's carbon-cycling capacity.</i>” (Larry Lohmann, 2006)</strong> | ||
===Emissions Trading Schemes=== | ===Emissions Trading Schemes=== | ||
Line 50: | Line 46: | ||
source: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/ets/auctioning/docs/auction_revenues_report_2017_en.pdf</ref> This was for carbon trading in EU, but if you consider carbon taxes that are levied nationally, it becomes more difficult to follow the revenues use.<ref>As citizens, nobody would like to learn that carbon pricing revenues are used to refund national debt or subsidy companies that are already thriving.</ref> | source: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/ets/auctioning/docs/auction_revenues_report_2017_en.pdf</ref> This was for carbon trading in EU, but if you consider carbon taxes that are levied nationally, it becomes more difficult to follow the revenues use.<ref>As citizens, nobody would like to learn that carbon pricing revenues are used to refund national debt or subsidy companies that are already thriving.</ref> | ||
Despite the goodwill of governments, some frauds have been spotted, like the case of French cement producer Lafarge who benefited of an overestimated CO2 emissions permit, while shutting down plants; thus being able to sell its extra allowances on the carbon market for a total exceeding €1100M in 5 years. Between 2008 and 2014, the cement sector might have made €2,7B of windfall profit from this allowances surplus.<ref>Carbon Market Watch & Sandbag are 2 NGOs who contributed to unveil this scandal. | Despite the goodwill of governments, some frauds have been spotted, like the case of French cement producer Lafarge who benefited of an overestimated CO2 emissions permit, while shutting down plants; thus being able to sell its extra allowances on the carbon market for a total exceeding €1100M in 5 years. Between 2008 and 2014, the cement sector might have made €2,7B of windfall profit from this allowances surplus.<ref>Carbon Market Watch & Sandbag are 2 NGOs who contributed to unveil this scandal. | ||
source: https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Cement-windfall-from-the-ETS_4page_final.pdf</ref> No surprise the EU decided to decrease the share of free allowances since 2013: some industries were literally paid to pollute! | source: https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Cement-windfall-from-the-ETS_4page_final.pdf</ref> No surprise the EU decided to decrease the share of free allowances since 2013: some industries were literally paid to pollute! | ||
Line 68: | Line 63: | ||
In the end, carbon market did not escape from the weakness of any young unregulated market, attracting so much scammers that Interpol, the international police, published a report about carbon trading crimes in 2013.<ref>See <i>Interpol Environmental Crime Program: Guide to carbon trading crime</i>, 2013. | In the end, carbon market did not escape from the weakness of any young unregulated market, attracting so much scammers that Interpol, the international police, published a report about carbon trading crimes in 2013.<ref>See <i>Interpol Environmental Crime Program: Guide to carbon trading crime</i>, 2013. | ||
source: https://www.interpol.int/Crimes/Environmental-crime/Pollution-crime</ref> | source: https://www.interpol.int/Crimes/Environmental-crime/Pollution-crime</ref> | ||
===Carbon taxes=== | ===Carbon taxes=== | ||
Line 94: | Line 88: | ||
source: https://sandbag.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020-SB-Path-of-least-resistance-1.2b_DIGI.pdf</ref> are particularly exposed to imports of low-cost coal electricity, because they have a significant electricity interconnection or because their energy policy contrasts with that of their non-European neighbouring countries. This, for sure, is a carbon leakage profitable to energy companies, shaping possible “offshore carbon havens”. That is why the new European Commission President has put forward border carbon adjustments; that could start with the power sector. This means to apply a carbon price to electricity imports, making them less appealing to Member States. Since 2015, EU imports more electricity that it exports; with Russia and Ukraine as main sources. In 2019, 33TWh of electricity worth €1,6B was imported into EU. It is still marginal, since it accounts for approximately 1% of EU’s total production; but much more interconnections and coal plants are planned.<ref>Sandbag NGO, <i>How Electricity generated from coal is leaking into the EU</i>, 2020. | source: https://sandbag.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020-SB-Path-of-least-resistance-1.2b_DIGI.pdf</ref> are particularly exposed to imports of low-cost coal electricity, because they have a significant electricity interconnection or because their energy policy contrasts with that of their non-European neighbouring countries. This, for sure, is a carbon leakage profitable to energy companies, shaping possible “offshore carbon havens”. That is why the new European Commission President has put forward border carbon adjustments; that could start with the power sector. This means to apply a carbon price to electricity imports, making them less appealing to Member States. Since 2015, EU imports more electricity that it exports; with Russia and Ukraine as main sources. In 2019, 33TWh of electricity worth €1,6B was imported into EU. It is still marginal, since it accounts for approximately 1% of EU’s total production; but much more interconnections and coal plants are planned.<ref>Sandbag NGO, <i>How Electricity generated from coal is leaking into the EU</i>, 2020. | ||
source: https://sandbag.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020-SB-Path-of-least-resistance-1.2b_DIGI.pdf</ref> | source: https://sandbag.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020-SB-Path-of-least-resistance-1.2b_DIGI.pdf</ref> | ||
==What are the concrete effects of carbon pricing on climate?== | ==What are the concrete effects of carbon pricing on climate?== | ||
Line 119: | Line 110: | ||
REDD Monitor website, Greta Thunberg: “We are not telling you to offset your emissions”, January 2020. | REDD Monitor website, Greta Thunberg: “We are not telling you to offset your emissions”, January 2020. | ||
source: https://redd-monitor.org/2020/01/25/greta-thunberg-we-are-not-telling-you-to-offset-your-emissions/</ref> | source: https://redd-monitor.org/2020/01/25/greta-thunberg-we-are-not-telling-you-to-offset-your-emissions/</ref> | ||
==To conclude== | ==To conclude== | ||
Line 132: | Line 120: | ||
source 1: https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/recession-did-not-lower-c02-emissions-6272333.html | source 1: https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/recession-did-not-lower-c02-emissions-6272333.html | ||
source 2: https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1332</ref> Glen P. Peters, a Norwegian scientist who participated to the later study, considers that in some ways the financial crisis was a missed opportunity to curb future emissions worldwide… A potential next question to open the scope of this carbon pricing series will be: “Will the 2020 economic crisis, that arise from the disastrous COVID19 virus, eventually put some governments on good tracks to Paris pledges, or is it a short minor break on carbon emissions?” | source 2: https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1332</ref> Glen P. Peters, a Norwegian scientist who participated to the later study, considers that in some ways the financial crisis was a missed opportunity to curb future emissions worldwide… A potential next question to open the scope of this carbon pricing series will be: “Will the 2020 economic crisis, that arise from the disastrous COVID19 virus, eventually put some governments on good tracks to Paris pledges, or is it a short minor break on carbon emissions?” | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == |